Submitted by cbilyk on July 1, 2010 - 8:27pm.
I am a proud member of ASCAP. I strongly believe in a musician's right to make money from performances, including recordings played on the radio or in public venues. I am also a staunch supporter of copyright in general.
That being said, I also respect the decision a person might make to relinquish some rights, for any reason. I love the freedoms and structures afforded by "copyleft", such as creative commons licenses. And using Creative Commons is, after all, a choice. Nobody is forced into it. I use it too!
Recently, I got the following email from ASCAP (with the subject linke "Safeguard your livelihood and the future of American Music"):
"On behalf of songwriters and composers everywhere, I am urging you to support ASCAP's Legislative Fund for the Arts (ALFA).
At this moment, we are facing our biggest challenge ever. Many forces including Creative Commons, Public Knowledge, Electronic Frontier Foundation and technology companies with deep pockets are mobilizing to promote "Copyleft" in order to undermine our "Copyright." They say they are advocates of consumer rights, but the truth is these groups simply do not want to pay for the use of our music. Their mission is to spread the word that our music should be free.
This is why your help now is vital. We fear that our opponents are influencing Congress against the interests of music creators. If their views are allowed to gain strength, music creators will find it harder and harder to make a living as traditional media shifts to online and wireless services. We all know what will happen next: the music will dry up, and the ultimate loser will be the music consumer.
We cannot afford to lose the support of our legislators either at this time or into the future. To this end, we must urge the members of Congress to support our rights.
Of course, a legislative campaign of this magnitude requires funds. We are coming to you--along with many other professional ASCAP members-- to help protect your future. Of course, we understand that these are tough times for everyone. Accordingly, we are asking you to make a very small contribution to wage this battle. Our thinking is that if everyone we are approaching responds with the modest sum we are requesting, it will add up to a reasonable result. In line with this, we are requesting that you write a personal check for five dollars ($5.00) or more made out to the ASCAP Legislative Fund for the Arts. If your contribution is greater than $200, federal law requires that you provide the necessary information requested on the attached form. Please send any checks to ASCAP Legislative Fund for the Arts, c/o Adrian Ross, One Lincoln Plaza, New York, NY 10023. Please note that corporate checks are not permissible.
You can also charge the amount to your credit card, if you prefer, by clicking on the following link:
https://members.ascap.com/ma/EwaWeb/pub/startOnlineDonation.do
Think of it as investing in your own future----which is precisely what it is. We will use the funds to advance our agenda in Washington on your behalf. Please read and complete the information requested on the attached form, and say "yes" to helping us help you safeguard your rights and your future income.
Many thanks,
Paul Williams"
Is copyright really in any danger from copyleft?
While I am not deep in the trenches, I don't think so. The public attitude that electronic media should be available for free long predates anything I ever heard about copyleft, and if anything, that attitude is dying.
Little by little, people are coming to realize that yes, it costs a lot of money and takes a lot of effort to make the things we wanted for free. And, in an age where it's easier for people to create and disseminate music and art on their own, the creators are starting to feel the effects in their own pockets. Not just that it takes money to make the art, but that if they could get paid for it, they could spend more time on it and do a better job, etc. With that in mind those creators, and any friends they can convince, have been supporting other artists by paying for the media instead of violating copyrights.
That's not to say I think it's all cotton candy out there, I just think things are looking up. I also think that it's about time for our laws to adapt and change, even if I don't know how they need to do it, so a little challenge here and there from the copyleft people is a good thing - it will help us refine our arguments, expectations, ideas, and models for making money. There was a similar upset with the advent of the player piano and the radio, and things got sorted out then too. In fact, it's the reason ASCAP and BMI came into being.
Maybe there are some pretty awful things going on. It is politics, after all. (If you know anything, go ahead and educate us in the comments!) But I don't feel threatened by the likes of Creative Commons. How can I in a country that has passed something so ridiculous as a copyright term of life + 70 years? (In case you're wondering, I've been saying life plus 20 is more than sufficient for ages, but that's another post in its own right.) And the country is run by a generation who largely doesn't believe in dowloading music (or maybe doesn't know how, ha!). Seriously, though, I just don't see how allowing people the choice of relinquishing some or all of their rights in any way threatens my ability to hold on to mine when I want to.
I left the link for donating in the letter above in case any readers want to support the cause, but I won't be sending ASCAP any money for this fight. I am happy that ASCAP exists, I'm glad that they can collect fees for me, I'm glad that I can secure my right to be paid for performances, but I'm not worried about or threatened by a person's right to CHOOSE to relinquish their rights in situations where they want to do so.
What do you think?